However, on Sunday, at least one rider shared a story of a time when Tesla’s remote support staff had to provide assistance. Although what transpired during that ride is unclear at first, the same rider subsequently reported that it was extremely smooth.
Does that imply that there is a problem with the acquisition or with Ive’s intentions to take the lead on design work at OpenAI? Mark Gurman of Bloomberg said the “transaction is on track and has NOT disintegrated or anything of the type,” so it is not exactly that way. Instead, he alleged, the company was forced to remove any documents that used the IO name because a judge had issued a restraining order over it.
“This page is temporarily offline due to a court order following a trademark complaint from iyO over our usage of the moniker ‘io.'” OpenAI later confirmed this, amending the previous announcement page with the following statement. We are considering our options because we disagree with the complaint.
According to the corporation, this has no bearing on the agreement with IO.
The iyO in question was born out of the Alphabet X “moonshot factory,” and its initial product was a pair of headphones with generative AI. According to a previous story at Bloomberg Law, iyO had sued OpenAI for trademark infringement, and the court indicated that she was amenable to the company’s claim that OpenAI’s promotional film might already be confusing consumers.
Leave feedback about this